URGENT – Ontario MPP Bob Delaney Trying to Force Fluoride on All Ontarians


Posted on December 15th, by Danny in Bob Delaney MPP, Fluoride Controversy, Fluoride History. 28 comments

Bob Delaney

This is a critical moment for the history of artificial water fluoridation in Ontario, Canada.

After years of hard work and many great successes to end artificial water fluoridation, Ontario MPP Bob Delaney has introduced a petition to the Ontario Legislature to “make the fluoridation of municipal drinking water mandatory in all municipal water systems across the Province of Ontario.”

You can see the video of Mr. Delaney’s motion in the Legislature on youtube here.

Mr. Delaney makes extraordinary false claims during his reading:

1) We are adding the same fluoride to the water that is “naturally found in water everywhere.” FALSE

We are not adding a natural fluoride to our drinking water. In Toronto, we are currently adding a toxic waste byproduct of the phosphate and aluminum industries to our water called hydrofluosilicic acid (HFSA). The fluoride found in most toothpastes is a filtered form of this chemical however there is still a mandatory “Do Not Swallow – Poison” warning on all packaging. HFSA has also been found to be heavily contaminated with arsenic and should never be ingested.

2) Drinking fluoridated water makes the outer layer of the teeth stronger resulting in less cavities. FALSE

The largest study ever conducted in the US on fluoride and the impact on dental decay found that there was no significant difference in dental decay between those living in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities (Brunelle & Carlos, 1990). Their research found that out of the 128 tooth surfaces in the mouth, fluoridated water may have decreased the amount of decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces by 0.6 out of 128. Who would want to ingest a chemical that the EPA has determined has a substantial amount of developmental neurotoxicity to save 10% of 1 tooth over an entire lifetime?

3) “I did benefit from municipal drinking water all my life in 3 provinces.” FALSE

Mr. Delaney makes it sound like Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia are all heavily fluoridated when in fact Quebec and British Columbia have some of the lowest rates of artificial water fluoridation in Canada. When the difference between Ontario and Quebec was studied by Statistics Canada, even their results showed that fluoridation may not do much for cavities. The results of the latest study on the effects of Calgary’s discontinuation of water fluoridation will be published (hopefully) in the spring and that should provide a much clearer picture on what will happen when Canada ends the practice.

The only truthful part of Mr. Delaney’s commentary is his statement that “…tooth decay and gum disease are not only preventable, they are easy to prevent…” However not by fluoridating the water supply with a known neurotoxin, but by brushing at least twice a day, flossing everyday, eating a well-balanced diet and reducing sugar intake.

Please email Mr. Delaney and let him know that we will not stand for this and we did not ask for this. It is not the job of government to add chemicals to our water supply.

bdelaney.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org

Even better, call Mr. Delaney’s office as soon as possible to speak up. His assistant will mark down that another concerned citizen has called. If enough people call, action can lead to change.

Office Telephone #: (905) 569-1643

Facebook: www.facebook.com/bobdelaneympp





28 thoughts on “URGENT – Ontario MPP Bob Delaney Trying to Force Fluoride on All Ontarians

    • These are very important links thank you for sharing. I will consider writing up a blog post identifying the key toxicological studies for future reference, and add them to the site. Thanks again.

  1. I hope the poisoning you are experiencing from the very Floride you claim is safe, is poisoning you with the karma you deserve.

    You should actually educate yourself on Floride with an open mind not the big corporation corrupted government current thought process lurking in your head. And they say ignorance is no excuse yet…. here it is in black and white.

  2. So, I guess it’s never occurred to you guys to actually research this issue from legitimate sources, such that you might actually have some senblance of understanding of it?

    Steven D. Slott, DDS

  3. I have submitted an email to Bob Delaney cc’ing several other MPPs. I phoned his office earlier today. The letter is as follows:

    ********************************************

    Tuesday, December 16, 2014

    Good afternoon Bob.

    I learned today of and viewed (twice because I couldn’t quite believe what I was hearing) the motion you read in the legislature on November 27, 2014. The purpose of my note today is to express my strong opposition to that motion along with my concern that you have acted in extreme haste without having done the requisite research. I find this minimally irresponsible trending to negligent, should you continue to spread the misinformation you presented and pursue the matter further.

    There is a plethora of modern and credible research that proves, without doubt, that the practice of adding hydrofluorosilicic acid (HFSA), (the form of fluoride being added in most municipalities, not fluorine as you claim), to our water supplies is dangerous and completely unnecessary. You dismiss this as ‘junk science’ by ‘fringe candidates’. I implore you to do your homework. The research done in the 1940s and 50s and pushed forward over the decades by special interest, has been proven to be seriously flawed. Cigarettes, DDT and asbestos were once claimed to be safe too! We now know different. An increasing number of municipalities, several in Ontario and throughout Canada, have done their due diligence and made the conscious and responsible decision to cease the practice. A handful of dentists, educated to tow the line I would argue, do not represent the true experts on the subject. It is frightful that you would react to their lobby.

    I am an individual who cares deeply about my health and that of my family and friends. I take ownership of my health. I am not a subject matter expert but rather an intelligent, informed and responsible individual. You will see a number of posts, references and comments on your Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/BobDelaneyMPP?fref=ts on this subject that I won’t restate here. Please, take the time to consult with those and other sources. I have copied two individuals whose expertise are highly respected, that is, Dr. Paul Connett and Heather Dawn Gingerich.

    As a 36 year resident of the province of Ontario, I wish to formally ask that you abandon this initiative. It is our basic human right to have access to water that is safe. The negative implications to our health from fluoride and other toxins being added to our water supplies is unacceptable and must be rectified.

    Regards, Cindy Wilcox

    • Cindy,

      Thank you very much for posting such a well-written letter. After 4 years of fighting this I am happy to see that people are awake to the reality of the lie that has been shoved down our throats for over 50 years.

      Keep going. We will win this battle.

      Danny

    • Mr. Delaney has removed all the comments on his FB page and comments are now disabled on FB and on Youtube. I read them all a few days ago and not one of them was in agreement with what he had done. I can’t believe this is happening in Canada.

  4. Is this guy on crack too? Seriously, wake up, it’s not in any way safe to ingest Fluoride…and it does nothing to promote tooth health. Lies, lies, lies….they’re gonna get you!

  5. Is this not the very definition of treason I ask you?(the offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
    2.
    a violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state.
    3.
    the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.) (Old French form influenced by the verb trair “betray.” In old English law, high treason is violation by a subject of his allegiance to his sovereign or to the state; distinguished from petit treason, treason against a subject, such as murder of a master by his servant.)Because after all they are PUBLIC SERVANTS!!!

    • Or even slow democide…
      “Democide is a term revived and redefined by the political scientist R. J. Rummel as “the murder of any person or people by their government, including genocide, politicide and mass murder.”

  6. Fluoride in a toothpaste is fine for those who choose to buy it and use it. The paste isn’t meant to be swallowed as the fluoride is acknowledged to be a toxic compound when taken internally.

    But I cannot discern how it being in our water can possibly benefit our collective tooth health. I don’t know about you, but when I drink a glass of water, it hardly hits my teeth at all.

    Living in Toronto, it pains me to know that the water that my family and friends have to drink is all contaminated by choice with an admittedly toxic compound.

    I sent Bob Delaney a similar message. Haven’t seen politicians leaning towards personal choice and freedom in my lifetime though, so I don’t hold out much hope on this one.

  7. Pingback: URGENT – Ontario MPP Bob Delaney Trying to Force Fluoride on All Ontarians | EndFluorideToronto.com | WHY I OCCUPY

  8. Does anyone know what the latest is on this? Can we band together with other fluoride watch groups around the province?

  9. In brief Ontario’s Safe Water Drinking Act states:
    “Prohibition
    20. (1) No person shall cause or permit any thing to enter a drinking water system if it could result in,
    (a) a drinking water health hazard;
    (b) a contravention of a prescribed standard; or
    (c) interference with the normal operation of the system. 2002, c. 32, s. 20 (1)….

    Dilution no defence
    20. (3) For the purposes of prosecuting the offence of contravening subsection (1), it is not necessary to prove that the thing, if it was diluted when or after it entered the system, continued to result in or could have resulted in a drinking water health hazard. 2002, c. 32, s. 20 (3)…
    Conflict
    166. (1) The provisions of this Act and the regulations prevail over the provisions of any other Act and any regulation made under any other Act, irrespective of when the other Act is enacted or the regulation is made under the other Act. 2002, c. 32, s. 166 (1).”

    -Chemicals added to drinking water, as well as any impurities in the chemicals, be supported by “toxicological evaluation.”

    http://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/municipal-drinking-water-systems-licencing-registration-and-permits

    The Safe Drinking Water Act (of Ontario) states that all
    water systems must meet licensing requirements. The license requires
    that chemicals used meet the National Sanitation Foundation
    Standard 60. This standard provides criteria to conduct a
    toxicological risk assessment (it must be tested for SAFETY!).

    “The NSF 60 standard requires that the chemicals added to drinking
    water, as well as any impurities in the chemicals, be supported by
    toxicological evaluation.” Stan Hazan, General Manager,
    Drinking Water Additives Certification Program, NSF
    “A toxicology evaluation of test results is required to determine if
    any contaminant concentrations have the potential to cause
    adverse human health effects” NSF Fact Sheet 2008.
    NSF 60 is recognized as authoritative in Canada.
    To certify materials to be safe,it must conduct twenty toxicological studies referred to in the NSF 60 regulation book.

    NSF has not done those twenty toxicological studies. NSF administrator Stan Hazan has admitted this under oath in a California deposition. NSF admits that instead it just relies on EPA’s maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for fluoridation materials and the contaminants therein, and as long as the concentration of each contaminant is below the EPA action level. Stan Hazan said the same thing in a 2000 letter to Congress. NSF does not take into account the symbiotic effect of so many different contaminants.
    http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/illegal

    Health Canada Has No Studies On Actual Fluoride Chemicals Used In Drinking Water

    http://winnipegalternativemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Health-Canada-FOI-Response-Letter-June2014.pdf

    The specific fluoride chemical used to fluoridate your drinking water is: hydrofluorosilicic acid ( HSFA ). Hydrofluosilicic acid is the most corrosive chemical agent known to man.(http://www.sonic.net/%7Ekryptox/environ/toxidump.htm). It is an unpurified industrial (toxic waste) by-product ( http://cof-cof.ca/hydrofluorosilicic ) that comes from the wet scrubbers of the smoke stacks of the phosphate fertilizer. Due to the lack of processing, this chemical is known to contain a number of toxic substances in its fluid mix such as FLUORIDE (20 to 30%), LEAD, ARSENIC, MERCURY, and it usually contains any or all of the following substances as well: cadmium, selenium, radium, radon, polonium, radioactive uranium 238, chromium and phosphorus.
    It is classified as:
    “dangerous good” by Transport Canada, “hazardous substance” by Environment Canada, “persistent, bio-accumulative & toxic” by Canadian Environmental Protection Act a “class one hazardous waste” by US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It is tanked untreated and shipped to municipalities as a “fluoridating agent”

    Here is a pdf I put together about water fluoridation. It is uploaded online so you can view it there or download it. It is a 38 page report with information that will prove that the facts you have been led to believe are false and unsupported.
     
    Health impact from water fluoridation

    http://www.mediafire.com/view/j1ivjqx8osocc8z/health_impact_from_water_fluoridation.pdf

    • Thank you for your very well-informed and detailed comment Allan. How people can allow politicians with zero medical experience to even consider adding any chemical to the water supply for all to drink in unlimited quantities is disturbing. Ending this barbaric practice is going to save millions of dollars and protect the public from further harm.

    • If I do run for politics I will run on a platform of personal choice. Forcing medication down the throats of all Torontonians regardless of health status, age, pre-existing medical conditions, etc… without a proper medical prescription will not only be on my hit-list, I will run to outright ban using any public water supply as a means of mass medicating the public. This will also result in saving millions of dollars on an annual basis which will help get Toronto’s deficit under control meaning more money in your pocket. Please read the following post on what “fluoride” actually is including the Freedom of Information Act Request from the City of Toronto and let me know your thoughts “http://www.endfluoridetoronto.com/where-does-fluoride-come-from/”

  10. I fear the answer to this question. What happens, following our victory on having this chemical removed from the drinking water supplies? How will the Corporations get rid of these huge amounts of toxic waste? I think that is why it is in the drinking water to disperse the huge quantity. Like other toxic waste from the nuclear plants. As a species we all lose the battle in the end cuz we have to live on this planet.

    • Hi Nicole thank you for your comment. I would not fear the answer to that question for waste is being disposed of properly around the world as we speak. The onus should be on the manufacturers of certain products to ensure their waste is being disposed of in an environmentally sound manner. Anything is possible however there are obviously costs involved with doing so. The cost to the environmental and our health from adding a chemical substance to the water supply as a means of waste disposal is much higher than disposing of it properly in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *